Barry Tubb, who is best known for his role as Leonard “Wolfman” Wolfe in the 1986 hit movie Top Gun, is seeking legal action against Paramount Pictures over what he alleges is the unauthorized use of his likeness in the 2022 sequel, Top Gun: Maverick.
Barry Tubb Allegations Against Paramount
In a complaint filed in California court and obtained by EW, Tubb claims that Paramount utilized his image in the sequel without his permission. Specifically, Barry Tubb asserts that the scene featuring a photograph of his character, Wolfman, alongside other original cast members was used without his consent.
Tubb contends that his likeness in the scene is not incidental but rather essential to the narrative, as the image establishes his character’s presence alongside other key figures, He further argues that the altered version of the photograph, derived from behind-the-scenes shots of the original actors, negates any copyright claims.
Company’s Lack of Consent and Deceptive Representation
According to Tubb’s complaint, Paramount never sought his consent to use his image in Top Gun: Maverick, and the original contract did not encompass such usage, particularly in a sequel released almost four decades later.
He accuses Paramount of misleading and falsely representing his affiliation with the sequel. as well as his involvement in its promotion.
Barry Tubb Seeks Legal Action and Demands
Seeking both compensatory and punitive damages, Tubb demands a trial by jury to address the alleged unauthorized use of his image.
The lawsuit underscores the importance of consent and contractual agreements in the entertainment industry, highlighting The need for accountability and respect for intellectual property rights.
Paramount’s Response Awaited
Paramount has yet to respond to EW’s request for comment regarding Tubb’s allegations, leaving the matter unresolved pending further legal proceedings.
Barry Tubb‘s lawsuit against Paramount serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding image rights annd the responsibility of studios to uphold agreements with actors.
As the case unfolds, it underscores the significance of protecting artists’ rights in the film industry.
